Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernestine Fu (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:48, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ernestine Fu

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet notability. Could use expansion, but otherwise the only thing notable about this person was appearing on Forbes 30 Under 30 a decade ago — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nswix (talk • contribs) 22:34, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 May 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:53, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think she's notable, one mention in Forbes, that doesn't look like and advertorial in GNews and one in a peer-reviewed journal, [1]. Oaktree b (talk) 17:02, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and California. Shellwood (talk) 17:17, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - article needs some work but alongside reliable sources such as 1 and 2 already on the article, it's easy to find more sources for example Business Insider 3 and 4. Proquest gives lots of hits eg The importance of being earnest in The Business Times and also she is now apparently an adjunct professor 5. Mujinga (talk) 17:52, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
saw this comment thread and found a few more reliable sources and more recent news/highlights that I contributed to the article Hjd555 (talk) 23:21, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:06, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I note that that adjunct professor position has resulted in few citations. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:08, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Looking at that google scholar I think there's another E Fu who is a scientist and the citations got rolled together. But this Fu doesn't need to pass NSCHOLAR becuase she passes GNG already. I just meant our article should include her current position. Mujinga (talk) 18:34, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:55, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:25, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A one-time media blitz for a student entrepreneur does not add up to long-term notability, and her subsequent career as a capitalist and part-time academic does not appear notable at all, neither under WP:GNG for the business work nor under WP:PROF for the academic side. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 11:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The first block of refs seems to be mostly alumni news but no real secondary coverage. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep^Talk 12:35, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. She appears generally notable per references such as the Vanity Fair article and others. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 23:25, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.